Implementing the HTTP/JSON -> gRPC conversion is a big undertaking and I'd advise against trying that (unless of course you want to spend your summer working on this fun project). gRPC offers better performance and security. grpc-dotnet: The new implementation written entirely in C with no native dependencies and based on the newly released. NET: Grpc.Core: The original gRPC C implementation based on the native gRPC Core library. otherwise it would probably be less work for you to convert your existing service to use gRPC and then use the HTTP/REST transcoding to expose your gRPC service as HTTP/JSON (or again use a gRPC gateway proxy to do this conversion for you). There are currently two official implementations of gRPC for.static void BindService (ServiceBinderBase. The bind method signature takes a Service Binder Base and an optional instance of the service base class, e.g.
#GRPC VS REST PERFORMANCE .NET CORE CODE#
The bind method is typically generated code and is used to register a services methods with the server on startup. if gRPC gateway support the conversion from HTTP/JSON REST to gRPC (it's the first time I'm hearing about it supporting that direction of the conversion), use can use the gRPC gateway written in golang as a proxy. Specifies the location of the service bind method for a gRPC service.In gRPC a streaming RPC can decide to compress or not compress messages. There are some things that would be difficult or impossible to do with REST. Doing so is likely non-trivial if the service is non-trivial (it's easy to do this conversion with handwritten code for one or two simple methods, but to do this in generality and robustness is a big project). gRPC is not faster than REST over HTTP/2 by default, but it gives you the tools to make it faster. But (as you also said), it only exposes the gRPC service as HTTP/REST API, not the other way round.įor converting an existing HTTP/REST API to gRPC service would basically require implementing it from scratch (come up with gRPC/Protobuf contract for the service and the implement a gRPC service that implements that contract and forwards all the calls to an HTTP/REST API).
Zero-allocation async/await and more with UniTask to improve performance. MagicOnion v5 will offer its own implementation of Pure C. In other words, MagicOnion also officially supports the use of gRPC in Unity. Of course, you can also use binary payloads and HTTP/2 directly without using gRPC, but this requires you and your clients to master more technology. NET Core based HTTP/2 support is not yet available in Unity.
gRPC uses a binary payload that is efficient to create and to parse, and it exploits HTTP/2 for efficient management of connections. As you pointed out, the feature for converting gRPC endpoint to HTTP/REST is currently experimental (see ), but work it being done to provide stable support (might be coming in. Another characteristic of gRPC is good performance.
0 kommentar(er)
